Legal Opinion

Craig v. Seitz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to superior court of Detroit. (Ohipman, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant John H. Seitz brings error.. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Sherwood, J.'

The plaintiff brought suit upon a judgment rendered on the third day of April, 1875, in the superior court of Detroit in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants.

Fredrick L. Seitz was defaulted, and by reason thereof judgment went against him.

*728John H. Seitz appeared, and pleaded the general issue, and gave notice thereunder that he would show that on the eleventh day of April, 1881, by the judgment of the district court of the United States for the Eastern district of Michigan, he was fully released and forever discharged from. the judgment of the claimed indebtedness in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Allen & Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Dusenbury v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Evans v. CareySupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  4. Stilwell v. CoopeNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  5. Fraley v. . KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bagaeff v. ProkopikMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Sundling v. WilleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Brewer v. BoyntonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Cook v. Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Hebinger v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API