Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Solinsky

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 15, 1907No. 1,633PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas.

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM,"

Oil the case made, the contract by the Citizens’ National Bank of Beaumont, under which it advanced the money to pay the composition to creditors in the bankruptcy of E. N. Brown, was illegal, because a part of the consideration thereof was that the bank’s debt against the bankrupt should be paid in full, notwithstanding the composition.

Solinsky was a party to the illegal contract, and therein agreed as a part of the inducement that he would return to the bank the amounts received by him under the composition as one of the creditors of the bankrupt, Brown. The present suit, being…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lieblein v. GeorgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API