Legal Opinion
Providence Square Associates, LLC v. Boney Wilson & Sons, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided January 26, 1999No. Civil Action 2:98cv743PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DOUMAR, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Boney Wilson & Sons, Inc., and Hannaford Bros., Co. (collectively, “Hannaford”) and the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by G.D.F., Inc. (“Rite Aid”). For the reasons stated below, Hannaford’s Motion for Summary Judgment will be GRANTED, and Rite Aid’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment will be DENIED.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Providence Square Associates, L.L.C. (“Providence Square”), owns and manages a shopping center in Virginia Beach. Defendants,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chaves v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Winn v. Aleda Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Duggin v. AdamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Providence Square Associates, L.L.C. v. G.D.F., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Providence Square Associates, L.L.C., and Boney Wilson & Sons, Incorporated Hannaford bros.co. v. G.D.F., Incorporated, T/a Rite Aid, Providence Square Associates, L.L.C. v. Boney Wilson & Sons, Incorporated Hannaford Bros. Co. G.D.F., Incorporated, T/a Rite AidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000