Legal Opinion

State v. Mussman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1975No. KCD 27463PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOMERVILLE, Presiding Judge.

A jury found defendant guilty of Burglary, Second Degree, and fixed his punishment at imprisonment by the Department of Corrections for three years. The state’s case rested on circumstantial evidence. Defendant seeks appellate relief on two grounds.

First, defendant urges that the wholly circumstantial nature of the state’s evidence failed to negate “every reasonable inference of [his] innocence.” Otherwise stated, defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction. In reviewing defendant’s first assignment of error, this court accepts as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Ernest S. Borum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. State v. RamseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. State v. AlewineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. WoodworthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. NashMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. BlairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. State v. CarrollMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. State v. BlandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API