State v. Alewine
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BARDGETT, Judge.
Thomas Arthur Alewine was found guilty by a jury of burglary in the second degree and stealing. Sections 560.070 and 560.110, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S. The jury stated their inability to assess punishment and the court sentenced defendant to two years on the burglary and two years on the stealing to run concurrently. Defendant appeals.
Defendant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction.
Defendant’s point I involves the failure of the magistrate court to appoint a lawyer for defendant at the preliminary hearing; points II and III concern the actions…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. CaffeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. RoyalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- State v. LaRetteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- State v. OldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.