Legal Opinion
Breen v. Henshaw
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 15, 1973No. Patent Appeal No. 8825PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention of the subject matter of the ten counts to sen-
*1399ior party Henshaw. Appellants provoked the interference by presenting claims in their application serial No. 343,856, filed February 10, 1964, which were copied from U. S. Patent No. 3,225,533, issued December 28, 1965, to Henshaw on application serial No. 231,457, filed October 18, 1962.1 Hen-shaw relied upon his Australian priority dates of October 19, 1961 and January 16, 1962, the benefit of which was accorded only for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Joshua C. Conner v. George G. JorisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Heard v. BurtonUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- Langer v. KaufmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Alvin L. Breen and Herbert G. Lauterbach v. Alfred Richmond, Robert Albert King and Alexander Henderson GentleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
3Cited by12 opinions
- Estee Lauder Inc. v. L'oreal, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Rosco, Inc. v. Mirror Lite Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Knorr v. PearsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Hitzeman v. RutterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.