Legal Opinion
Pekin Insurance v. Beu
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 6, 2007No. 1-06-1676PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Brien
Defendants Roger and Linda Beu appeal the order of the circuit court granting plaintiff Pekin Insurance Company’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, finding that plaintiff had no duty to defend them against an underlying negligence action. On appeal, defendants contend that the court erred in finding no duty to defend under the terms of the insurance policy issued by plaintiff. We affirm.
Roger Beu entered into a contract with Castle Builders regarding the construction of a residence located at 14504 Nelson Road in Woodstock, Illinois. Plaintiff issued a liability insurance policy to Castle…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- United States Fire Insurance v. SchnackenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Village of Hoffman Estates v. Cincinnati InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- United States Fire Insurance v. Aetna Life & CasualtyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Amerisure Mutual Insurance v. Microplastics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- National Fire Insurance of Hartford v. Walsh Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Pekin Insurance v. Hallmark Homes, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Illinois Emcasco Insurance Company v. Waukegan Steel Sales, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Pekin Insurance Company v. Roszak/ADCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.