Legal Opinion

Hazel v. Medical Action Industries, Inc.

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided August 16, 2002No. 1:01-cv-00017PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

COGBURN, United States Magistrate Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the court in accordance with 28, United States Code, Section 636(c), and upon defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Having considered defendant’s motion, plaintiffs response, and defendant’s reply, and having further considered defendant’s memorandum of additional relevant authority, the court enters the following findings, conclusions, and decision.

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

I. Factual Background

The factual recitations contained in the briefs of the respective parties are extensive and supported by…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. James H. Spriggs v. Diamond Auto Glass Richard A. Rutta Ernest StickellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rizzitiello v. McDonald's Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  2. HARGRAVE v. DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICADistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API