Legal Opinion

HARGRAVE v. DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided December 17, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00838Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA BRIAN HARGRAVE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:19CV838 ) DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OSTEEN, JR., District Judge Presently before the court is Defendant Daimler Trucks North America’s (“Defendant” or “DTNA”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 19.) DTNA filed a brief in support of its Motion, (Doc. 20); pro se Plaintiff Brian Hargrave (“Plaintiff”) filed a response, (Doc. 31), and DTNA filed a reply, (Doc. 32). For the reasons stated herein, this court will grant Defendant’s…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API