Legal Opinion

United States v. Graham

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 20, 1976No. 29,413PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COOK, Judge:

The question before us is the admissibility of evidence of a previous conviction in the form of an order promulgating the results of trial and the action of the convening authority. Appellate defense counsel contend that a promulgating order is inadmissible unless it has endorsed, on its face, information establishing accomplishment of the kind of review required by the Uniform Code of Military Justice, including, as provided by Army regulations, a “designation of the command in which the review was accomplished, the date, the result of the review, and . . .…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. HeflinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. ReedUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. PageU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977
  2. United States v. HancockU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
  3. United States v. LachapelleU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
  4. United States v. ScottU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API