Legal Opinion
In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Caruso-Sturcey Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 18, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDoscher, J.
On or about July 20, 1951, Turbine Equipment Company (herein called Turbine) delivered to Caruso-Sturcey Corporation (herein called Caruso), under a conditional bill of sale, certain equipment. The said sale was made on the theory that Caruso would use the said equipment in connection with a public improvement. Before making any payment on account of the sales price, Caruso executed and delivered an assignment for the benefit of creditors.
Turbine has now petitioned the court for an order enjoining and restraining the assignee for the benefit of creditors from selling the materials involved…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baker v. HullNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- In re the Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors By PellegriniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- In Re the Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Brown Bomber Baking Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Merkel, Inc. Monarch Marking System Co.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- In re Merkel, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Randy's Super Foods, Inc., New York County Courts1957