In re the Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors By Pellegrini
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
On February 25, 1936, the predecessors of the petitioner sold to the assignor a certain Globe slicing machine upon a conditional sales contract providing that title to the machine should remain in the seller until the entire purchase price was paid. That contract was never filed. On April 22, 1936, the buyer made a general assignment for the benefit of his creditors to the respondent and, at' the time of the assignment, the buyer was in default and none of the installments provided for in the contract had been paid. The respondent, the assignee, took possession of the sheer and claimed it as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- John P. Kane Co. v. . KinneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Baker v. HullNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- John W. Snyder, Inc. v. AkerNew York Supreme Court · 1929
- Stich v. PirklNew York Supreme Court · 1917
- Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. HortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Merkel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- In re Merkel, Inc. Monarch Marking System Co.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Thelmco, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1940
- In re Merkel, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Caruso-Sturcey Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.