Legal Opinion
In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Randy's Super Foods, Inc.
New York County Courts
Decided January 22, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCyril J. Brown, J.
Under separate conditional sales agreements respondents, S. & M. Schwartz & Co. and Toledo Scale Company, sold certain equipment and fixtures to petitioner’s assignor, a domestic corporation. The equipment was installed in the assignor’s place of business in Queens County and copies of the sales agreements were filed in the proper district. Subsequent thereto, the assignor, with respondents’ knowledge, moved the fixtures and equipment to Nassau County. Neither respondent filed copies of its agreement in Nassau County subsequent *586to the removal and shortly thereafter the conditional vendee…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baker v. HullNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- In re the Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors By PellegriniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- In Re the Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Brown Bomber Baking Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- In re the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Caruso-Sturcey Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1951
- In re the Assignment of Central Park Dairyland, Inc., New York County Courts1942
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Merkel, Inc. Monarch Marking System Co.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- In re Merkel, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965