Legal Opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Gordon Form Lathe Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 12, 1937No. 7363, 7364PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAYMOND, District Judge.
The bill charged defendant, Ford Motor Company, with infringing claims 1, 2, 12, 23, 24, 28 to 30, 33, 34, and 38 to 42 of letters patent No. 1,542,803, issued June 16, 1925, to Gordon Form Lathe Company, upon application filed July 16, 1920, by Charles Gordon and Alfred W. Redlin. One of defendant’s machines, known as the Walcott or Melling machine, was charged to infringe all of the claims enumerated, while another machine, known as the Pioch machine, was alleged to infringe claims 29 and 30. The defenses pleaded were invalidity and noninfringement. Defendant has…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wine Railway Appliance Co. v. Enterprise Railway Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Davis Sewing Mach. Co. v. New Departure Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Gordon Form Lathe Co. v. Walcott MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- R. M. Hollingshead Co. v. Bassick Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Portland Gold Mining Co. v. HermannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Joel A. Del Francia v. Stanthony Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Gordon Form Lathe Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- Blanc v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Cincinnati Milling MacHine Co. v. TurchanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Hale Fire Pump Co. v. Tokai, Ltd.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.