Legal Opinion
Wine Railway Appliance Co. v. Enterprise Railway Equipment Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 2, 1936No. 356PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mu. Justice McReynolds
delivered the opinion of the Court.
In 1922, respondent, Equipment Company, sued the petitioner for infringing certain patents. April 25, 1923, petitioner, Appliance Company, by counterclaim, charged that respondent had infringed its patents and .asked for damages. The District Court dismissed both bill and counterclaim. The Circuit Court of Appeals held one of petitioner’s patents valid and infringed and remanded the cause for an accounting.
The master reported (June 17, 1932) that profits amounting to $18,002.83 had been realized on the infringing device and recommended…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sessions v. RomadkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Dunlap v. SchofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Uriah A. Boyden, in Error v. Edmund BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
3Cited by62 opinions
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- American Medical Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Medical Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Saenger Organization, Inc. v. Nationwide Insurance Licensing Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.