Legal Opinion
Klein v. Spear, Leeds & Kellogg
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 20, 1970No. 68 Civ. 5148PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOPER, District Judge.
Defendants Spear, Leeds & Kellogg, James C. Kellogg III, Raymond E. Grabowski (Kellogg defendants), Mabon, Nugent & Co., Weingarten & Co. (Nu-gent defendants) and Vanden, Broeck, Lieber & Co. (Vanden), moving separately seek summary judgment dismissing the first and third causes of action of plaintiff’s amended complaint. See Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P.
Plaintiff is an habitual litigant who in the past five or six years has commenced well over thirty lawsuits against a very large number of defendants. He does not desist when the loss of an action occurs. Such defeats…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Schoenbaum v. FirstbrookCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Saylor v. LindsleyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Klein v. Spear, Leeds & KelloggDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Energy Systems Equipment Leasing Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Mittendorf v. JR Williston & Beane IncorporatedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Johnson v. Bd. of County Com'rs County of FremontDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994
- Somerset Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. KimballDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.