John Doe v. David Baum
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THAPAR, Circuit Judge.
Thirteen years ago, this court suggested that cross-examination may be required in school disciplinary proceedings where the case hinged on a question of credibility. Flaim v. Med. Coll. of Ohio , 418 F.3d 629 , 641 (6th Cir. 2005). Just last year, we encountered the credibility contest that we contemplated in Flaim and confirmed that when credibility is at issue, the Due Process Clause mandates that a university provide accused students a hearing with the opportunity to conduct cross-examination. Doe v. Univ. of Cincinnati , 872 F.3d 393 , 401-02 (6th Cir. 2017). Today,…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by270 opinions
- John Doe v. Purdue UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- John Doe v. Princeton UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- John Doe v. University of the SciencesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- John Doe v. University of Southern IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- John Doe v. Columbia College ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
265 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.