Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Warren Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1937No. 11555PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

1. “The granting and continuing of injunctions shall always rest in the sound discretion of the judg'e, according to the circumstances of each case. The power shall be prudently and cautiously exercised, and except in clear and urgent cases should not be resorted to.” Code, § 55-108. A judgment denying an injunction will not be disturbed by the Supreme Court when it appears that the decision of the judge was based on conflicting evidence, and that there was no abuse of discretion. Hightower v. Lane, 114 Ga. 348 (40 S. E. 238). Under the pleadings and the evidence, this ease…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hill v. McBurney Oil & Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Hightower v. Lane, Tillman & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Warren Company v. DicksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Douglas v. WagesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Moon v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Maddox v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Smilie v. Taft Stadium Board of ControlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API