Legal Opinion

Moon v. Clark

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1941No. 13671PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

There is no evidence to support the allegations of combination and conspiracy. The remaining complaint is based upon the alleged public nuisance resulting in private injury to the plaintiff. “Generally, a public nuisance gives no right of action to any individual. If a public nuisance shall cause special damage to an individual, in which the public do not participate, such special damage shall give a right of action.” Code, § 72-103. A public nuisance is one which damages all persons who come within the sphere of its operation. It may vary in its effect upon individuals.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Warren Company v. DicksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Dean v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  3. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. GillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Gullatt v. State ex rel. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  5. Voyles v. CarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Maddox v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  2. State Highway Department of Georgia v. REED, MAYORSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  3. Johnson v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Ungar v. Mayor &C. of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  5. Dozier v. ManghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API