Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Bank of America

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 1986No. D001853PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, J.

Plaintiffs Ronald and Carole Barrett appeal from the judgment entered on a special verdict in favor of defendant Bank of America. We conclude the court prejudicially erred in failing to instruct the jury on constructive fraud and reverse the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

Ronald and Carole Barrett (Barretts) were principal shareholders in Pride Electronics, Inc. (Pride). Pride obtained a $253,000 Small Business Administration (SBA) loan and a $400,000 accounts receivable line of credit with Bank of America (Bank). In connection with these loans, the Barretts…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Klein v. First Edina National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Stewart v. Phoenix National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Suk Yong Kim v. Sumitomo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Price v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Capital Bank v. MVB, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API