Legal Opinion

B. B. & R. Knight, Inc. v. W. L. Milner & Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 29, 1922No. 333PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WESTENHAVER, District Judge.

This cause involves alleged infringement by defendant of a trade-mark and unfair competition. It has been fully heard and argued upon an application for a preliminary injunction. Due consideration has been given to the several contentions of parties, and a conclusion has been reached satisfactory to me; but in the press of business I can only submit a memorandum sufficient to inform counsel of the grounds of my conclusion.

The facts are really not in dispute, with perhaps one exception. No extended statement of the case needs to be made. B. B. & R. Knight, Inc., are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Coca Cola Co. v. Gay-Ola Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  3. Krauss v. Jos. R. Peebles' Sons Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1893
  4. Cheney Bros. v. Cimbel Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1922
  5. Coca-Cola Co. v. StevensonDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. California Peach & Fig Growers, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1928
  2. Bayer Co. v. ShoyerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Caterpillar, Inc. v. Nationwide EquipmentDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1994
  4. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co. v. Shelley Knitting Mills, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Monsanto Chemical Co. v. Perfect Fit Products Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API