Legal Opinion

Monsanto Chemical Co. v. Perfect Fit Products Manufacturing Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 31, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McLEAN, District Judge.

This is an action for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and false description of goods. Plaintiff seeks an injunction, an accounting of defendant’s profits, damages and expenses. An injunction pendente lite was granted on consent on Decembex-- 31, 1958 and is still in effect.

Complete findings of fact and conelusioxxs of law are filed herewith and will not be repeated in detail here. This opinion will be limited to a brief statement of the court’s reasons for the x*esult embodied in its findings and conclusions.

I am satisfied that plaintiff is entitled to a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Prestonettes, Inc. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Triangle Publications, Inc. v. RohrlichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  4. Admiral Corp. v. Penco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  5. Deering, Milliken & Co., Inc. v. Joseph Gilbert, Individually and Doing Business as Gilbert Textile CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. H. Lubovsky, Inc. v. Esprit De Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API