Legal Opinion

Bayer Co. v. Shoyer

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 1939No. 8743PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KALODNER, District Judge.

Complainant, in an equity suit involving trade mark infringement and unfair competition, seeks to restrain the defendants from advertising and selling the plaintiff’s product — Bayer Aspirin Tablets — under labels alleged to simulate those of the plaintiff, and alleged to bear plaintiff’s two trade marks “Bayer” and the “Bayer Cross”, the latter a circular symbol upon which the word “Bayer” appears twice in the form of a cross.

After hearing upon a rule to show cause why a preliminary restraining order should not issue, Judge Kirkpatrick, in this District, allowed a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Prestonettes, Inc. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. HanafyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2000
  2. In Re Circuit Breaker LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1994
  3. Chanel, Inc. v. Casa Flora Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. Bulova Watch Co. v. Allerton Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
  5. Clairol, Inc. v. Martin Wholesale Distributors, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API