Legal Opinion
Borough of Lansdale v. PP & L, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 16, 2007No. Civil Action 02-8012PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
YOHN, District Judge.
The Boroughs of Lansdale, Blakely, Ca-tawissa, Duncannon, Hatfield, Kutztown, Leighton, Mifflinburg, Olyphant, Quaker-town, Schuylkill Haven, St. Clair, Watson-town, and Weatherly, Pennsylvania (“the Boroughs”) bring this action against PP & L, Inc., PPL Electric Utilities Corp., PPL Energy Plus, L.L.C., and PPL Generation, L.L.C. (collectively, “PPL”) alleging various antitrust violations and asserting a claim for breach of contracts approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). (Compl.lffl 14-19, 20-22.) Defendants asserted…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McCray v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- McCray v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- MARSHACK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021