Legal Opinion

MARSHACK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 15, 2021No. 3:19-cv-12840Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JANICE MARSHACK, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-12840 (MAS) . MEMORANDUM OPINION COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. SHIPP, District Judge This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Janice Marshack’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. (ECF No. 17.) Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant” or “Commissioner”) opposed the motion (ECF No. 18), and Plaintiff replied (ECF No. 19). The Court has carefully considered the parties’ submissions and decides the matter without oral argument…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  4. Lucia v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API