Legal Opinion
Fisher v. City of Cincinnati
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 13, 1990No. C-1-90-0551PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARL B. RUBIN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure filed by defendants City of Cincinnati, Lawrence Whalen, Donald Andres, Chuck Beebe, and Steve Wong. (Doc. No. 7). Plaintiff Steven Fisher has filed a response in opposition to this motion 1 (Doc. No. 16) and the defendants have replied. (Doc. No. 18).
Defendants contend that plaintiffs amended complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, entitling them to judgment in their favor as a matter of law. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Anthony Boone v. Phillip Spurgess A/K/A Philip SpurgusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- In Re Cincinnati Radiation LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
- Heinrich Ex Rel. Heinrich v. SweetDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Holland Ex Rel. Holland v. City of HoustonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
- Stone v. HolzbergerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.