Legal Opinion

Dishon v. State ex rel. McCracken

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1862PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Orange Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

Suit against Dishon, a former trustee of the township, and his sureties, on his official bond. Alleged breach, a failure to pay to his successor, the relator, certain moneys alleged to be in his hands.

Demurrer, assigning, 1. That there was not a proper party plaintiff, nor any proper relator. 2. That it does not state facts, etc. This was overruled.

Is there a proper party plaintiff?

The trustee is the treasurer of the township. Acts 1859, p. 222. He receives .and disburses the moneys of the township, and, at the expiration of his term of service it is made his duty (Id., sec. 12) to pay over…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. VotawIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Madison Civil Township v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Steinmetz v. State ex rel. BrickaIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Hiatt v. State ex rel. KitselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Hawthorn v. State ex rel. Johnson TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API