Legal Opinion

Hiatt v. State ex rel. Kitselman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1887No. 12,779PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The relator’s complaint is based on the official bond of Milton R. Hiatt, executed by him as principal, and by the other appellants as sureties, to secure the faithful performance of his duties as treasurer of the board of school trustees of the school town of Ridgeville. The breach alleged is the failure of Hiatt to turn over to the relator, who was duly elected his successor, the school funds in his hands.

• It is insisted by appellants that the complaint is defective, because it does not aver that Hiatt’s term of office had expired. That such an averment is essential is affirmed in the case…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Halbert v. State ex rel. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Morse v. GilmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Rock v. StingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Westfall v. StarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Inglis v. State, ex rel. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mandell v. Centrum Frontier Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. State ex rel. Madison Civil Township v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Meridian National Bank v. HauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State Ex Rel. Pink v. CockleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API