Legal Opinion

Ex parte Robinson

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1887No. 20275PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

The petitioner was adjudged guilty of contempt in the Superior Court of Del Norte County for refusing to pay certain sums of money which the court had directed him to pay as costs and attorney fees-*609in an action for divorce therein pending between his wife and himself.

In the action referred to, the plaintiff—wife of petitioner—had been awarded a decree of divorce, the defendant had moved for a new trial, and prepared and served his bill of exceptions. The plaintiff, having no means to present her defense to said motion, applied to the court for an order requiring the defendant to pay the cost…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Batchelder v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re McCartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. France v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. In Re WasherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Matter of Application of ShoemakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API