Legal Opinion
Juvelis Ex Rel. Juvelis v. Snider
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 10, 1995No. 94-2207UnknownCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.
In this ease we must decide whether the policy of Pennsylvania’s Department of Public Welfare requiring intent to establish domicile discriminates under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794(a) (1988), against a profoundly retarded individual on the basis of his handicap. The district court found the policy discriminatory and required the Department of Public Welfare to fund retardation services for the plaintiff Nikitas Juvelis. We will affirm.
I
Nikitas Juvelis (Niki) is a profoundly retarded and physically handicapped 33 year old…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Vlandis v. KlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jayne G. Nathanson v. The Medical College of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Juvelis, Juvelis v. SniderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995