Legal Opinion

State v. Razo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2004No. 03CA008263PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Batchelder, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Ranulfo Razo, appeals from the judgment in the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas that found him guilty of rape. We affirm.

I

{¶ 2} On March 20, 2002, the Lorain County Grand Jury indicted Razo on ten separate counts of rape, in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b); each count of rape carried a sexually violent predator specification. Razo had assigned trial counsel, as well as a second attorney whom the trial court judge had appointed to translate the proceedings into Spanish. The trial court judge found this second attorney to be fluent in Spanish to assist…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. CaudillOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. United States v. Salvador E. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. Lopez-OlmedoOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. State v. AbdugheneimaOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. KamiOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. WangOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. AbouelhanaOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API