Pace v. Provident Savings Life Assur. Soc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Mississippi.
1Per curiam
The receipt for first premium, which is the basis of this suit, does not appear to have been given or issued by a duly-authorized agent of the Provident Life Assurance Society. If considered as issued by a duly-authorized agent, and to be a binding receipt of the company, still it must be construed in connection with the application and the statements therein, and held to effect insurance upon the life of the applicant only in case the application was thereafter accepted by the society.
The decree of the circuit court seems to be in accordance with the law and the facts of the case, and it is…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Starr v. Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Hyder v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Corn v. United American Life Ins. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1952
- Stanton v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926