Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stanton v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 28, 1926No. 12074Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : This is an action, not upon a policy of life insurance, for such has never been issued. It is based upon the following facts which are practically undisputed:

On October 4, 1917, James A. Stanton applied to the defendant for $25,000 insurance, payable in the event of his death to his estate. The application showed, above the signature of the applicant, that he had, during the then past 5 years, used alcoholic beverages to the extent of intoxication. The medical examination was made by Dr. J. H. Reese, a local physician for the company, who reported that the applicant had been…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. Young's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Gardner v. North State Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. NeafusCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Heiman v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  5. Cooksey v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API