Legal Opinion

Hampton v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 7, 2004No. 04 C 3456PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MORAN, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff Earl Hampton filed a six-count complaint against defendants, who he alleges are collectively responsible for his false arrest and wrongful conviction for a 1989 murder. Defendants Cook Count State’s Attorney (State’s Attorney) and assistant state’s attorney Robert M. Podle-sak (Podlesak), contend that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and that the complaint should be dismissed against them pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is granted.

BACKGROUND

In…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Currie v. LaoIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Healy v. VaupelIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. White v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  2. Bowes v. AlvarezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2024
  3. Crowder v. BarrettDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
  4. Culp v. Harrah's Illinois CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  5. Linke v. BaitsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API