Legal Opinion
Heron v. City and County of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 21, 1966No. 21706PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schauer
Plaintiff in error was the plaintiff in the trial court, where defendants in error were the defendants. They will be referred to as they there appeared, or by name.
Ordinance No. 252, Series of 1962, City of Denver, Colorado, published and republished as “Chapter 3, Permits and Inspections,” Section 330, subsection (f), provides as follows:
“(f) Responsibilities for Design. Any person, firm or corporation may submit drawings and specifications in connection with an application for a permit in accord anee with the following limitations. For the purpose of this Chapter where the term ‘architect’…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Highland Farms Dairy, Inc. v. AgnewSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Gabriel v. Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Taylor v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- City of Denver v. Denver Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Montgomery v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Constitution Associates v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Goebel v. Colorado Department of InstitutionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Board of County Commissioners v. Park County Sportsmen's Ranch, LLPSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Beacom Ex Rel. Seventeenth Judicial District v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Three Bells Ranch Associates v. Cache La Poudre Water Users Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.