Legal Opinion
Roinc v. Venlaur Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 25, 1948No. Civ. No. 15879PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The questions for decision are (1) whether letter No. 1 written by respondents expresses their total obligation to appellant; (2) whether it was so modified by their letter No. 2 written seven months later as thereby to enlarge their debt to appellant; (3) whether the court erred in ex-*554eluding appellant’s offer of parol evidence to prove that letter No. 2 was intended as such modification of letter No. 1.
Respondents as real estate brokers in the city of Los Angeles formulated a plan for the development of certain lots situate at the northwest corner of Ventura and Laurel Canyon Boulevards.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Body-Steffner Co. v. Flotill Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Moore v. BorgfeldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- California Employment Stabilization Commission v. WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- El Dora Oil Co. v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Gottlieb v. Tait's IncorporatedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Edgar Rice Burroughs, Inc. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962