Legal Opinion

Edgar Rice Burroughs, Inc. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 5, 1962No. Civ. 26012PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

In April 1931, plaintiff executed a contract granting MGM the right to create and write an original story using the character, Tarzan, and to produce a photoplay based thereon. Thereafter, it wrote an original story and produced a photoplay known as the 1932 version of “Tarzan, the Ape Man” (hereinafter referred to as the first photoplay). Under Paragraph 14 of the contract, MGM had the “right to reissue said first photoplay, and likewise to remake said first photo-play and also to produce additional photoplays based on said story. Metro agrees, however, that all remakes of the first…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Weitzenkorn v. LesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Stanley v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Lowell v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Kurlan v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Sheehy v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burroughs v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Alperson v. Mirisch Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Burroughs v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  4. Burroughs v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  5. SDR Capital Management, Inc. v. American International Speciality Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API