State v. Scampini
Supreme Court of Vermont
Information for selling intoxicating liquor without a license in violation of No. 90, Acts- 1902. Heard on general and special demurrer to the whole information, and to each count thereof, at the September Term, 1903, Washington County, Stafford, J., presiding., Demurrers overruled, pro forma. The respondent excepted. The opinion fully states the case. The information should allege that the people of the ■city of Barre had voted “Yes” under § 2, of the act.
Read the full summary
Information for selling intoxicating liquor without a license in violation of No. 90, Acts- 1902. Heard on general and special demurrer to the whole information, and to each count thereof, at the September Term, 1903, Washington County, Stafford, J., presiding., Demurrers overruled, pro forma. The respondent excepted. The opinion fully states the case. The information should allege that the people of the ■city of Barre had voted “Yes” under § 2, of the act. The ■court will not take judicial notice of the result of that vote. Com. v. Green, 98 Ky. 21; Taylor v. Com., 40 So. W. Rep. (Ky.) 383;…
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.
The respondent is informed against by the state’s-attorney for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. The information contains eight counts. A general and special demurrer is interposed to’ the whole information, and also to each count. The information is based upon section sixty-eight of No. 90, Acts of 1902. The act was approved December 11, 1902. Therein it is provided, “Sec. 100. This act shall take effect on the first Tuesday of March, A. D., 1903, provided that if a majority of the ballots to be cast as hereinafter provided shall be No, then this act shall take effect the first…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Sabre v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913
- Holcombe v. Georgia Milk Producers ConfederationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Hill v. BainSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1885
- Vermont Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. SorrellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.