Legal Opinion

Marriage of Miller v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1991No. C2-90-2396PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appeal from trial court’s decision to reserve jurisdiction over maintenance after entry of dissolution judgment and decree limiting jurisdiction. Appellant asserts the trial court erred in reserving and extending jurisdiction over maintenance and payment of health insurance premiums for an additional five years despite language in the marital termination agreement, adopted by the original judgment and decree, limiting future modification to one specific instance. We reverse.

FACTS

The parties were married on June 1, 1957. In 1983, the parties began steps to dissolve the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Marriage of Karon v. KaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Marriage of Keating v. KeatingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Borgeson v. BorgesonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Ultraflex Enterprises' Appeal from Decertification in the Minnesota Small Business Procurement ProgramCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Matter of Ultraflex Enterprises'appealCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API