Legal Opinion

Matter of Ultraflex Enterprises'appeal

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 16, 1993No. C8-92-1970Published

1Opinion of the Court

497 N.W.2d 641 (1993)

In the Matter of ULTRAFLEX ENTERPRISES' APPEAL FROM DECERTIFICATION IN the MINNESOTA SMALL BUSINESS PROCUREMENT PROGRAM.

No. C8-92-1970.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 16, 1993.

Patricia M. Siebert, Pamela S. Hoopes, Kevin P. Staunton, Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Kaufman, Ltd., Minneapolis, for relator Ultraflex Enterprises.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Amy V. Kvalseth, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondents State of Minnesota and Dana B. Badgerow, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Admin.

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, P.J., and SCHUMACHER…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Stein v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API