Legal Opinion

Marriage of Keating v. Keating

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 29, 1989No. C6-89-399PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

The parties entered into a stipulation defining the amount and term of maintenance payments owed to wife. Prior to the end of the term, wife’s motion for modification of the maintenance award was granted. Husband brought a motion to reconsider in light of Karon v. Karon, 435 N.W.2d 501 (Minn.1989). The trial court denied husband’s motion and he appeals therefrom. We affirm.

*606FACTS

Appellant Edward Keating and respondent Donna Keating were married on November 7, 1953, and the decree of dissolution was entered on July 2, 1981. The parties were 56 and 53 years old respectively…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marriage of Karon v. KaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Eckert v. EckertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Bissell v. BissellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Elm Creek State Bank v. Department of BankingNebraska Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Loo v. LooSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Marriage of Gessner v. GessnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Marriage of Grachek v. GrachekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Borgeson v. BorgesonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Marriage of Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API