Legal Opinion

Drum v. Leta

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 7, 1986No. 00707PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County granting appellant’s petition to strike a confessed judgment entered against him, but denying appellant’s request for attorney’s fees. Appellant raises one issue on appeal. He contends that the lower court erred in ruling that he was not entitled to collect reasonable attorney’s fees. We agree, finding that an award of reasonable attorney’s fees is mandatory in this instance, where appellant has prevailed in causing a judgment by confession against him to be stricken, under 41 P.S. § 407(b).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gardner v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. RCK, INC. v. KatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Langman v. Metropolitan Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Oberneder v. Link Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Generation Mortg. Co. v. Bung Thi NguyenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Croft v. P & W Foreign Car Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Householder v. Kensington Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Leonard v. Wessel (In Re Jackson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API