Legal Opinion

RCK, INC. v. Katz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 10, 1984No. 778PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

In this appeal we are asked to construe Section 407(a) of the Act of January 30, 1974 (“Act”), P.L. 13, as amended, 41 P.S. § 407(a), and determine how Section 407(a) affects a creditor’s efforts to execute upon a confessed judgment.

Section 407(a) of the Act states that

[a]s to any residential real property, a plaintiff [creditor] shall not have the right to ... execute ... on a note ... confessing judgment until plaintiff, utilizing such procedures as may be provided in the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedures [Pa.R.C.P. Nos. 2981-86], files an appropriate action and proceeds to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. General Electric Credit Corp. v. SlawekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Citizens National Bank v. E. H. Bilowich Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Sines v. PackerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Drum v. LetaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. In Re OlickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Beckett v. LauxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. First National Bank v. KoneskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Beamesderfer v. Hoke, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API