Legal Opinion
Millsap v. Federal Express Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1991No. A048261PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEIN, J.
Lisa Millsap was injured when her car was struck by an automobile driven by Christopher Pence. As relevant, Millsap brought an action against Pence and against North Country Express (NCE) and Federal Express Corporation (FEC) on the theory that Pence was an employee of NCE acting in the course and scope of his employment at the time of the accident, and that FEC had contracted with NCE for the work done by Pence; i.e., the delivery of parcels, which had been flown by FEC to the local airport. The superior court entered judgment upon the motions of NCE and FEC for summary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Ochoa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Maloney v. RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- JKH Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Bostrom v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Alexander v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Air Couriers International v. Employment Development DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Jackson v. AEG Live, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.