Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Board of Transportation v. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion to dismiss.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

In September, 1887, the board of transportation required the respondent to reduce its freight rates within the state • 33'g-- per cent. The respondent neglected to comply with the order, whereupon the board filed a petition in this court setting forth the facts and praying for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to comply with the order. The respondent demurred to the petition, and after full argument the demurrer was overruled and leave given to answer. See 22 Neb., 313. The respondent now files an answer (omitting formal parts) as follows:

“Defendant admits that on the first day of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Board of Transportation v. Fremont, Elkhorn & Valley R. R.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. NavinIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Wabash Railroad v. Railroad CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State ex rel. Rhodes v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  4. Poor v. Iowa Cent. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1907
  5. State ex rel. Board of Transportation v. M. P. R. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API