Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Board of Transportation v. M. P. R. Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Original application for mandamus. Special privileges cannot be granted by common carriers even when such privileges do not consist in actual transportation. (Q’ouehv. R. Co., 78 Eng. C. L., 255; Marriott v. R. Co., 87 Id., 499; Sanford v. R. Co., 24 Pa. St., 382; Olcottv.

Read the full summary

Original application for mandamus. Special privileges cannot be granted by common carriers even when such privileges do not consist in actual transportation. (Q’ouehv. R. Co., 78 Eng. C. L., 255; Marriott v. R. Co., 87 Id., 499; Sanford v. R. Co., 24 Pa. St., 382; Olcottv. Supervisors, 16 Wall. [U. S.], 695; N. E. Express Co. v. JR. Co., 57 Me., 188; R. Comr’s v. R. Co., 63 Id., 269; McDuffee v. R. Co., 52 N. H., 449 ; Scofield v. R. Co., 43 O. St., 571.) The order of the board falls within the police power of the state. (Munn v. Illinois, 94 U. S., 125; Cooley, Const. Lim. [5th Ed.], 706;…

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to perform the order of the board of trails - portation.

It appears from the record that in October, 1889, John W. Hollenbeck, Cyrelius Lemasters, John W. Miller, John Hayes, Charles Hall, and others, under the name of *552the Elmwood Farmers’ Alliance No. 365, of Cass county? presented their petition to the board of transportation, in •which they allege:

“First — That the petitioners and complainants are now and have for many years been extensive raisers of corn, wheat, oats, and other cereals; and that large quantities of said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mattoon v. Republican Valley RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  2. State v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. People ex rel. Spruance v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. State ex rel. Board of Transportation v. Fremont, Elkhorn & Missouri Valley RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. State ex rel. State Board of TransportationNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API