Legal Opinion
Lucid v. Citizens Investment Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 13, 1920No. Civ. No. 2161PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries, and the appeal is by the plaintiff from the judgment of dismissal of the action entered after and upon the order sustaining the demurrer to the second amended complaint, the plaintiff having failed or refused further to amend, notwithstanding that he was by the court given leave to amend within ten days from and after the making of the order sustaining the demurrer.
The salient facts stated in the complaint may be given in a summary fashion as follows: That the defendant, a corporation, was and had been for a long period of time the owner of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Mullen v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Clifford v. Atlantic Cotton MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Maenner v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
- Owings v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1856
- Kalis v. ShattuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Salt Lake City v. SchubachUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- Dennis v. City of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Meloy v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Provin v. Continental Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Lewis v. Jake's Famous Crawfish, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934