Legal Opinion

Leming v. Howell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 2, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Sampson — •

Affirming.

Appellant Leming, a dealer in farming implements, sold appellee Howell, a farmer, a farm tractor for $700.00.' The machine proved unsatisfactory and Howell tendered it back and sued Leming for the $700.00 paid him for the tractor. Appellant Leming defended on two grounds: (a) He did not warrant the tractor, and (b) if there were, a warranty, as claimed by appellee Howell, he was too late in demanding a rescission of the contract.

Appellee Howell testified and introduced evidence to prove that appellant Leming warranted the tractor in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnard v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Hauss v. SurranCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Debaun v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  5. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Walters Bros.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A. C. Morris Co., Incorporated v. HeatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Add-Index Corporation v. Griffith DixonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Ross v. Riedley Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API