Leming v. Howell
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Sampson — •
Affirming.
Appellant Leming, a dealer in farming implements, sold appellee Howell, a farmer, a farm tractor for $700.00.' The machine proved unsatisfactory and Howell tendered it back and sued Leming for the $700.00 paid him for the tractor. Appellant Leming defended on two grounds: (a) He did not warrant the tractor, and (b) if there were, a warranty, as claimed by appellee Howell, he was too late in demanding a rescission of the contract.
Appellee Howell testified and introduced evidence to prove that appellant Leming warranted the tractor in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barnard v. NapierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Hauss v. SurranCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Debaun v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Walters Bros.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
3Cited by3 opinions
- A. C. Morris Co., Incorporated v. HeatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Add-Index Corporation v. Griffith DixonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Ross v. Riedley Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938