Legal Opinion
Hauss v. Surran
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided February 24, 1916PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Appeal from Campbell Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion or the Court by
William Eogebs Clay, Com-. missioneR
— Reversing.
*688Plaintiff, Albert F. Hauss, brought this suit against George Surran to recover tbe balance of tbe purchase price of a small electric light plant. Defendant counterclaimed for damages for breach of warranty. The jury-found for defendant and judgment was entered accordingly. Plaintiff has moved for an appeal.
On May 7, 1914, plaintiff contracted with the defendant to install an electric light plant, consisting of machinery and appliances connected to 150 light outlets for Tungsten lamps and one G. E. arc light. The purchase…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Shupe v. CollenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
- Elwood v. McDillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Dick v. James Clark, Jr., Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Cook v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867
3Cited by17 opinions
- Glover Machine Works v. Cooke-Jellico Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Northwest Perfection Tire Co. v. Perfection Tire Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Ades v. WashCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Black Motor Co. v. FoureCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Louisville Point Lumber Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.