Legal Opinion

Barnard v. Napier

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 19, 1916PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Perry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hurt

Reversing.

The appellant, Fred Barnard, by his petition, alleged that the appellees, Irvine Napier and eleven others, executed and delivered their three promissory notes for the sum of $800.00, each, by which they promised to pay to Bauhard Brothers or order the sum of $800.00 by each of the notes, at the- Bank of Hindman, Hindman, Kentucky, at the maturity of the notes. The notes matured on September 1st, 1909; September 1st, 1911, and September 1st, 1912, respectively. He further' alleged that for a valuable consideration, and before maturity and in due…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Fourth Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  3. Asbury v. TaubeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Muir v. EdelenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Miller v. GaitherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commercial Security Co. v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Owsley County Deposit Bank v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Mackenzie v. Eschmann's ExecutorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Taylor & Co. v. Nehi Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Pioneer Trust Co. v. CombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API